Legal Opinion

State v. . Schlichter

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided September 28, 1927PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Stacy, 0. J.

The State’s application for writ of certiorari to bring up the record in this case for review was made and allowed under Article IV, sec. 8, of the Constitution which empowers this Court, among other things, “to issue any remedial.writs necessary to give it a general supervision and control over the proceedings of the inferior courts.” The remedial appropriateness of the writ is established by the authorities on the subject. S. v. Swepson, 83 N. C., 585, and cases there cited.

' The question of law presented by the record arises out of the following fact situation:

1. At the August…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Ex Parte United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
  2. State v. EverittSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1913
  3. State v. . TrippSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1914
  4. State v. HardinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1922
  5. State v. . HiltonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1909

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Myers v. . BarnhardtSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1932
  2. State v. . JaynesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1930
  3. State v. MooreSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
  4. State v. . RhodesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1935
  5. Owens v. . PhelpsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1886

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API