Legal Opinion

State v. Womack

Court of Appeals of Utah

Decided October 22, 1998No. 971539-CAPublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

JACKSON, Judge:

Roy Womack challenges the trial court’s denial of his motion to suppress evidence and his consequent conviction for possession of a controlled substance in a drug-free zone, in violation of Utah Code Ann. §§ 58-37-8(2)(a)(i) and 58-37-8(5)(a) (1996), following a conditional guilty plea under State v. Sery, 758 P.2d 935, 939 (Utah Ct.App.1988) (holding conditional plea valid when court and prosecutor accept agreed-upon condition). We affirm.

BACKGROUND

On February 21, 1996, United Parcel Service (UPS) tried to deliver a package sent from California to Roy Womack at 120 West…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited51 opinions

  1. Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. State v. ThurmanUtah Supreme Court · 1993
  3. State v. SeryCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1988
  4. United States v. Garcia, Appeal of Jose A. Figueroa-Rivera, Gabriel Grant, Celina Wilson-GrantCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1989
  5. United States v. Steven RicciardelliCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1993

46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. GlassSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
  2. Commonwealth v. StainesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2004
  3. State v. CrowleyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2002
  4. State v. PennCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2004
  5. Dodson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 2006

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API