State v. Penn
Court of Appeals of Utah
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
GREENWOOD, Judge:
¶ 1 Defendant, Dr. Nathaniel Penn, appeals his conviction of three enhanced second degree felony counts of Unlawful Possession of a Controlled Substance in a Drug-Free Zone, in violation of Utah Code Annotated sections 58 — 37—8(2)(a)(i) (Supp.2003) and 58-37-8(4)(a) (Supp.2003). 1 Penn argues that this court should reverse and remand for a new trial because (1) evidence obtained as a result of an invalid anticipatory warrant should have been excluded; (2) one of the jury instructions was plainly erroneous and denied Penn his right to a fair trial; (3) the State failed…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Strickler v. GreeneSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- State v. DanielsUtah Supreme Court · 2002
- State v. BakalovUtah Supreme Court · 1999
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- State v. DavisCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2007
- State v. O'BANNONCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2012
- State v. O'BannonCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2012
- State v. Vasquez-MarquezCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2009
- State v. Vasquez-MarquezCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2009