Legal Opinion

State v. Penn

Court of Appeals of Utah

Decided June 24, 2004No. 20030638-CAPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

GREENWOOD, Judge:

¶ 1 Defendant, Dr. Nathaniel Penn, appeals his conviction of three enhanced second degree felony counts of Unlawful Possession of a Controlled Substance in a Drug-Free Zone, in violation of Utah Code Annotated sections 58 — 37—8(2)(a)(i) (Supp.2003) and 58-37-8(4)(a) (Supp.2003). 1 Penn argues that this court should reverse and remand for a new trial because (1) evidence obtained as a result of an invalid anticipatory warrant should have been excluded; (2) one of the jury instructions was plainly erroneous and denied Penn his right to a fair trial; (3) the State failed…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Strickler v. GreeneSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  4. State v. DanielsUtah Supreme Court · 2002
  5. State v. BakalovUtah Supreme Court · 1999

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. DavisCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2007
  2. State v. O'BANNONCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2012
  3. State v. O'BannonCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2012
  4. State v. Vasquez-MarquezCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2009
  5. State v. Vasquez-MarquezCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API