Legal Opinion

Rowland v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided May 31, 1985No. 602-83CPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION ON DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

PHILIP R. MILLER, Judge:

Statement

The complaint in this case alleges that for several years prior to December 31, 1978, plaintiff owned and operated a sand and gravel dredging business on leased land adjoining the Sac River in St. Clair County, Missouri.

Situated on such leasehold were the following items of equipment and machinery with the in-place fair market value of each item claimed therefor by plaintiff as of December 31, 1978:

1. Dredging Barge $7,200.00

2. Steel structures on barge 650.00

3. Cutter Head 5,400.00

4. Sand and gravel pump…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. First Nat. Bank of Ariz. v. Cities Service Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. United States v. General Motors Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1945
  3. Kimball Laundry Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
  4. United States v. Petty Motor Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946
  5. Omnia Commercial Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1923

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Heydt v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1997
  2. Rogers Truck Line, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1987
  3. Yuba Natural Resources, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1986
  4. Paul v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API