Legal Opinion

Morris v. Sykes

Utah Supreme Court

Decided January 21, 1981No. 16838PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CROCKETT, Justice: *

Plaintiff Morris sued for specific performance of a contract to purchase some undeveloped land in Alaska by compelling defendants Sykes to accept the balance thereon and convey the land to the plaintiff, or in the alternative, to relieve the plaintiff from an unjust and inequitable forfeiture of the $23,216 plaintiff had paid on the contract. Upon a trial to the court, it found against the plaintiff on the issue of requiring defendants to convey the property to the plaintiff, but as a part of that judgment permitting the defendants to keep their property, the court decreed…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Perkins v. SpencerUtah Supreme Court · 1952
  2. Moran v. HolmanAlaska Supreme Court · 1972
  3. Lilienthal v. KaufmanOregon Supreme Court · 1964
  4. Jacobson v. SwanUtah Supreme Court · 1954
  5. Ferris v. JenningsUtah Supreme Court · 1979

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Resource Management Co. v. Weston RanchUtah Supreme Court · 1985
  2. In Re BoothUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Utah · 1982
  3. Jeffs v. StubbsUtah Supreme Court · 1998
  4. Thurston v. Box Elder CountyUtah Supreme Court · 1995
  5. Bean v. WalkerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API