Legal Opinion

Tarnow v. Railway Express Agency

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided December 3, 1951No. Docket 50, Calendar 45,075PublishedCited by 37 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBushnell, J.

Plaintiff Herbert A. Tarnow, on October 10, 1938, while loading a packing case at ¡the Kalamazoo station of defendant Railway Express Agency, slipped and injured his back. He was paid compensation to December 24, 1938, when he-returned to work to help out during the holiday rush •season. A settlement '.receipt was then filed and approved.

Tarnow’s work thereafter was of a clerical nature and did not involve heavy lifting. Although wearing a brace, he suffered increasing pain and was unable to continue work after March 10,1944.

A complete physical examination with a myelogram, on August 11,…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Hajduk v. Revere Copper & Brass, Inc.Michigan Supreme Court · 1934
  2. Harrison v. MetzMichigan Supreme Court · 1868
  3. McKisson v. DavenportMichigan Supreme Court · 1890
  4. Allen v. Kalamazoo Paraffine Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1945
  5. Angell v. City of West Bay CityMichigan Supreme Court · 1898

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by37 opinions

  1. Lahti v. FosterlingMichigan Supreme Court · 1959
  2. Rookledge v. GarwoodMichigan Supreme Court · 1954
  3. Autio v. Proksch Construction Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1966
  4. Bemis v. Texaco, Inc.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1965
  5. Kidd v. General Motors Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1982

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API