People v. Bob
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtCarter, J.
Defendant Bob has been adjudged guilty of the crime of murder of the first degree and sentenced to pay the extreme penalty. His appeal is automatically before this court by virtue of the provisions of section 1239 of thé Penal Code.
After his arrest Bob told the officers freely of the circumstances leading to the homicide, and at the trial he repeated his story on the witness stand.
It appears' that in the early evening of November 16, 1945, Bob and an acquaintance named Johnson met in a pool hall in Stockton and decided to go out “hustling,” which in the vernacular means “to roll a drunk,…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- People v. SimmonsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
- People v. BoggessCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
- People v. DarbyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944
- People v. Yee Fook DinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
- People v. ConverseCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1915
3Cited by29 opinions
- People v. EasleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1983
- People v. CudjoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
- People v. ColemanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
- People v. StanworthCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
- People v. FrankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.