Legal Opinion

People v. Yee Fook Din

California Supreme Court

Decided February 28, 1895No. 21174PublishedCited by 16 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco and from an order denying a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtMcFarland, J.

The defendant was charged with the crime of an assault with intent tó commit murder, alleged to have been made with a dagger, and was convicted. He appeals from the judgment and from an order denying a motion for a new trial.

It is clear that improper evidence highly prejudicial to appellant was erroneously admitted, and the only question is whether or not appellant made and took proper objections and exceptions.

The assault was committed about midnight on December 4, 1893, at the corner of Pacific and Dupont streets, in the city of San Francisco, and defendant was not arrested until January…

2Cited by16 opinions

  1. People v. RiserCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
  2. People v. DaniellyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
  3. People v. BoggessCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
  4. People v. O'BrienCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
  5. People v. PianezziCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1940

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API