Legal Opinion

Bohrer v. Dienhart Harness Co.

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided January 11, 1898No. 1,761PublishedCited by 11 opinions

From the Tippecanoe Superior Court.

1Opinion of the CourtBlack, J.

— The appellee recovered judgment against the ajipellant. The questions presented on appeal were raised by the appellant’s exception to the court’s conclusions of law upon the facts stated in a special finding. The south part of a certain lot in the city *491of Lafayette was owned by one James D. Marshall. There was on said south part a three-story brick building, which was occupied and used, under a lease from said Marshall, as a storehouse and place of business, by the appellee, a corporation engaged in manufacturing and jobbing harness and saddlery, and it had in said building goods of the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Railway Co. v. WoodIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
  2. White Sewing Machine Co. v. RichterIndiana Court of Appeals · 1891
  3. Moellering v. EvansIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
  4. Block v. HaseltineIndiana Court of Appeals · 1892
  5. Clore v. McIntireIndiana Supreme Court · 1889

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Walker v. StrosniderWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1910
  2. Evansville Hoop & Stave Co. v. BaileyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1908
  3. Houston & Texas Central Railroad v. GeraldCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1910
  4. Aetna Life Insurance Co. v. BurtonIndiana Court of Appeals · 1938
  5. Broadhurst v. . Blythe Brothers Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1941

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API