Legal Opinion

State v. Mims

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided January 16, 2001No. AC 19694PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

2Per curiam

The defendant, Leroy Mims, appeals from the judgment of conviction, rendered after a jury trial, of assault of a peace officer in violation of General Statutes § 53a-167c (a) (l).1 On appeal, the defendant claims that (1) the evidence presented at trial was insufficient to establish guilt beyond a reasonable doubt, (2) he received ineffective assistance of counsel and (3) the statutory definition of physical injury violated his due process rights because it is overbroad and, even if it is not overbroad, the officer’s injury was not legally sufficient to sustain a felony charge. We…

3Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. LeecanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1986
  2. Mercer v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 1998
  3. State v. LaracuenteConnecticut Appellate Court · 2000
  4. State v. MooreConnecticut Appellate Court · 1985
  5. State v. LashConnecticut Appellate Court · 1990

4Cited by11 opinions

  1. State v. DouglasConnecticut Appellate Court · 2011
  2. Kelley v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2005
  3. State v. RiveraConnecticut Appellate Court · 2002
  4. Truglio v. Hayes Construction Co.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2001
  5. Burton v. DimyanConnecticut Appellate Court · 2002

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API