Legal Opinion
Burton v. Dimyan
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided April 2, 2002No. AC 21252PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
2Per curiam
The pro se plaintiff, Nancy Burton, appeals from the trial court’s judgment of nonsuit rendered against her. In this appeal, she claims that the *845trial court improperly (1) rendered the judgment of nonsuit, (2) granted the defendants’ motions to strike the counts of her complaint that alleged a violation of the Connecticut Unfair Trade Practices Act (CUTPA), General Statutes § 42-110a et seq., and (3) denied her motions for stay, transfer and disqualification without a hearing.1 We affirm the judgment of the trial court.
The following procedural history is necessary for our resolution of…
3Cases cited4 opinions
- Millbrook Owners Ass'n v. Hamilton StandardSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2001
- Elm Street Builders, Inc. v. Enterprise Park Condominium Ass'nConnecticut Appellate Court · 2001
- P & L Properties, Inc. v. Schnip Development Corp.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1994
- State v. MimsConnecticut Appellate Court · 2001
4Cited by5 opinions
- Ridgaway v. Mount Vernon Fire Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2018
- McHenry v. NusbaumConnecticut Appellate Court · 2003
- Ridgaway v. Mount Vernon Fire Ins. Co.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2016
- Anderson v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2015
- Burton v. DimyanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2002