Dye Construction Co. v. Industrial Commission
Colorado Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
BERMAN, Judge.
Petitioner, Dye Construction Company (Dye), seeks review of the Industrial Commission’s affirmance of the hearing officer’s ruling that the State Compensation Insurance Fund had authority to cancel petitioner’s Workmen’s Compensation insurance policy for petitioner’s failure to file a quarterly report. We affirm.
Dye is a Colorado employer which maintained Workmen's Compensation insurance through the State Compensation Insurance Fund (State Fund). An endorsement of Dye’s insurance policy provided that the earned premium for the policy would be due and payable each calendar year…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Medford v. Pacific National Fire InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1950
- Dyche v. BostianSupreme Court of Missouri · 1950
- De Campos v. State Compensation Insurance FundCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
- Gulf Ins. Co. v. RiddleCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1947
- Francam Building Corp. v. FailSupreme Court of Colorado · 1982
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Pueblo School District No. 70 v. TothColorado Court of Appeals · 1996
- Of Butkovich v. Industrial CommissionColorado Court of Appeals · 1984
- Wilson v. Director, Division of LaborColorado Court of Appeals · 1984
- Kentucky League of Cities, Inc. v. General Reinsurance Corp.District Court, W.D. Kentucky · 2001