Legal Opinion
In re Tidd
Court of Judicial Discipline of Pennsylvania
Decided April 4, 2018No. 3 JD 16PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION BY PRESIDENT JUDGE BARTON
The Judicial Conduct Board (Board) filed a Complaint against Former Judge David W. Tidd on August 26, 2016. Following a seven day trial, the parties submitted proposed findings of fact and conclusions of law during July and August, 2017. On December 15, 2017, this Court found that Former Judge Tidd violated Rule 2.16(B) of the Rules Governing Standards of Conduct of Magisterial District Judges (MDJ Rules). MDJ Rule 2.16(B) provides that a judge shall not retaliate, directly or indirectly, against a person known or suspected to have assisted or cooperated with…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- In Re BerkhimerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
- In Re Angeles Roca First Judicial District Philadelphia CountySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
- In re MelograneSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
- In re RocaCourt of Judicial Discipline of Pennsylvania · 2016
- Gelinas v. J. J. Newberry Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1939
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- In re JenningsCourt of Judicial Discipline of Pennsylvania · 2018
- In re ShawCourt of Judicial Discipline of Pennsylvania · 2019