Legal Opinion

Gelinas v. J. J. Newberry Co.

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided October 3, 1939No. 3103PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPage, J.

The defendant has waived all exceptions other than those to the denial of its motions for a nonsuit and a directed verdict.

The defendant employed the plaintiff as a saleswoman in its store. One of the plaintiff’s duties was to keep her counter supplied with stock, and in case it were depleted, to go to the stock-room for the necessary supply. The stock-room was in the basement, and the stock-racks were separated by aisles. The room was dark except when in use.

Having occasion to go to the stock-room on June 12, 1936, the plaintiff switched on an electric light in the main aisle near a safe.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Harlow v. LeclairSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1927
  2. Maltais v. ConcordSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1933
  3. Clairmont v. CilleySupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1931
  4. Stone v. JohnsonSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1938

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Schoof v. ByrdSupreme Court of Kansas · 1966
  2. Fasekis v. J. J. Newbury Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1945
  3. Colby v. AverySupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1945
  4. In re TiddCourt of Judicial Discipline of Pennsylvania · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API