Gelinas v. J. J. Newberry Co.
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
1Opinion of the CourtPage, J.
The defendant has waived all exceptions other than those to the denial of its motions for a nonsuit and a directed verdict.
The defendant employed the plaintiff as a saleswoman in its store. One of the plaintiff’s duties was to keep her counter supplied with stock, and in case it were depleted, to go to the stock-room for the necessary supply. The stock-room was in the basement, and the stock-racks were separated by aisles. The room was dark except when in use.
Having occasion to go to the stock-room on June 12, 1936, the plaintiff switched on an electric light in the main aisle near a safe.…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Harlow v. LeclairSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1927
- Maltais v. ConcordSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1933
- Clairmont v. CilleySupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1931
- Stone v. JohnsonSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1938
3Cited by4 opinions
- Schoof v. ByrdSupreme Court of Kansas · 1966
- Fasekis v. J. J. Newbury Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1945
- Colby v. AverySupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1945
- In re TiddCourt of Judicial Discipline of Pennsylvania · 2018