Legal Opinion

Ryan v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided December 28, 2009No. 1-09-0553PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Lampkin

In this dispute involving a vehicle collision and uninsured motorist coverage, the insured, plaintiff Gerald Ryan, appeals the trial court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of his insurer, defendant State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company (State Farm). Plaintiff contends he is entitled to coverage because the vehicle at issue was not furnished or available for his regular use and, thus, not excluded from uninsured motorist coverage under his State Farm insurance policy. For the reasons that follow, we affirm the judgment of the trial court.

I. BACKGROUND

The facts are not in dispute.…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Loyola Academy v. S & S Roof Maintenance, Inc.Illinois Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Gillen v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceIllinois Supreme Court · 2005
  3. Robert D. Voelker v. The Travelers Indemnity CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1958
  4. Prairie v. University of Chicago HospitalsAppellate Court of Illinois · 1998
  5. Moore v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceMississippi Supreme Court · 1960

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Illinois Insurance Guaranty Fund v. Virginia Surety Company, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2012
  2. Illinois Insurance Guaranty Fund v. Priority Transportation, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API