Legal Opinion

Ashland Oil & Refining Co. v. Bond

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided November 30, 1953No. 5-187PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGeorge Rose Smith, J.

This was originally an action at law brought by Durbin Bond to recover the sum of $12,737.85, alleged to be due to Bond as his share of the proceeds from the sale of oil produced from a well as to which Bond and the defendant, Ashland Oil & Refining Company, are colessees. The complaint asserts that Ashland, as the operating lessee, has wrongfully charged to Bond certain expenses incident to reworking the well. Ashland’s principal defense is that Bond’s share of these expenses should be deducted from his pro rata part of the income from the venture. The cause having been transferred to…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Earp v. Mid-Continent Petroleum Corp.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1933
  2. New Domain Oil & Gas Co. v. McKinneyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1920
  3. Prairie Oil & Gas Co. v. AllenCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1924
  4. Burbridge v. Bradley Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1951
  5. Paepcke-Leicht Lumber Co. v. CollinsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1908

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Shaw & Estes v. Texas Consolidated OilsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1957
  2. Budd v. Ethyl CorporationSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1971
  3. Fife v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1986
  4. McMillan v. PowellSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1962
  5. Budd v. Ethyl CorporationSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1971

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API