Grunsky v. Field
California Court of Appeal
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. A. E. Percival, and Louttit & Middlecoff, for Appellant.
1Opinion of the CourtMcLAUGHLIN, J.
Defendant prosecutes this appeal from the judgment and from an order denying his motion for .a new trial. The action was brought to recover commissions on a sale of real estate, under a contract which reads as follows: “Field Ranch March 11, 1903. In consideration of one dollar the receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, I authorize Grunsky & Dietrich, for five months, to sell my farm of 160 acres, including standing crop, for $65.00 per acre, and I agree if any sale results through the efforts of said Grunsky & Dietrich, at above or less price, to pay them the commissions of 5 per cent. J.…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Brewster v. HartleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1869
- Gregory v. GregoryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
- People v. DouglassCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
- Landers v. BoltonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1864
- Muller v. RowellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- People Ex Rel. Department of Public Works v. Glen Arms Estate, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1964
- Rossi v. ZappaterraCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
- Tulare County Department of Public Social Services v. Brenda K.California Court of Appeal · 1994