Legal Opinion

Collins v. Marvil

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided June 19, 1896No. 17,827PublishedCited by 7 opinions

From the Gibson Circuit Court

1Opinion of the CourtJordan, J.

— The questions presented by this case have been decided adversely to the contentions of appellant, in the opinion of this court in the appeal of State v. Qerhardt, ante, 439, with one exception, which is the contention herein of appellant that the law does not permit a remonstrator, under section nine of the Act of 1895, (Acts of 1895, p. 248), to use only the initials of his Christian name in signing a remonstrance against granting a license to' an applicant to sell intoxicating liquors. This claim as made by appellant cannot be sustained.

In the case of State, ex rel., v. Beck, 81 Ind. 500,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Vanderkarr v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1875
  2. State ex rel. Collings v. BeckIndiana Supreme Court · 1882
  3. Hanna v. Cincinnati & Fort Wayne R. R.Indiana Supreme Court · 1863

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. GreggIndiana Supreme Court · 1913
  2. Old Wayne Mutual Life Ass'n v. McDonoughIndiana Supreme Court · 1905
  3. Good v. BurkIndiana Supreme Court · 1906
  4. Stembel v. BellIndiana Supreme Court · 1903
  5. Miller v. ReslerIndiana Supreme Court · 1909

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API