Legal Opinion

Hanna v. Cincinnati & Fort Wayne R. R.

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided May 15, 1863PublishedCited by 11 opinions

APPEAL from the Allen Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtHanna, J.

Suit on a subscription to tbe capital stock of said company. Tbe pleadings were so framed as to present tbe question of tbe power of tbe corporation to consolidate witb another company, and at tbe same time retain tbe right to enforce tbe collection of said subscription, tbe subscriber never having consented to said consolidation. Judgment for plaintiff.

This corporation was organized under tbe general railroad . law, (1 R. S. 1852, p. 420,) tbe 37th section of wbieb is, that “ This act may be amended or repealed at tbe discretion of tbe Legislature.” Tbe articles of association were signed…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Bishop v. BrainerdSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1859
  2. Northern Railroad v. MillerNew York Supreme Court · 1851
  3. Peters v. St. Louis & Iron Mountain RailroadSupreme Court of Missouri · 1856
  4. Montgomery v. WayneIllinois Supreme Court · 1853

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Swartwout v. Michigan Air Line RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1872
  2. County of Scotland v. ThomasSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
  3. Springfield Lighting Co. v. HobartMissouri Court of Appeals · 1902
  4. Dow v. Northern RailroadSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1886
  5. State ex rel. Hobart v. SmithSupreme Court of Missouri · 1903

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API