Legal Opinion
Device Trading, Ltd. v. VIKING CORP.
Michigan Court of Appeals
Decided April 21, 1981No. Docket 47044PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtT. M. Burns, J.
Plaintiff, Device Trading, Limited, of Bangkok, Thailand, brought the instant action to recover damages resulting from an alleged breach of an exclusive-distributorship agreement made with the defendant, Viking Corporation, which is the manufacturer of the Viking Firecycle sprinkler system. Plaintiff claimed that it suffered damages arising out of the expenses it incurred and the profits that it lost in a building project for the Royal Thai Army when defendant breached the exclusive-distributorship agreement.
In a complaint filed on July 13, 1977, plaintiff alleged the existence of the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Froling v. BischoffMichigan Court of Appeals · 1977
- Macarthur Patton Christian Ass'n v. Farm Bureau Insurance GroupMichigan Supreme Court · 1978
- Miller v. RadikopfMichigan Supreme Court · 1975
- Fisk v. PowellMichigan Supreme Court · 1957
- Philips Industries, Inc v. SmithMichigan Court of Appeals · 1979
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Kovacs v. Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1984
- Soloman v. Western Hills Development Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1981
- Cornforth v. Borman’s, IncMichigan Court of Appeals · 1986
- Johnson v. Patmon, Young & Kirk, PCMichigan Court of Appeals · 1982
- Retained Realty, Inc. v. Michigan Pioneer Title InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2012
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.