Legal Opinion

Hicks v. Davis

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided February 12, 1916No. 19,943PublishedCited by 26 opinions

Original proceeding in mandamus.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

DAWSON, J.:

The plaintiff asks for a writ of mandamus to A compel the auditor of state to draw a warrant in his favor against the “state grain inspection fee fund” in the custody of the state treasurer, pursuant to an appropriation item in “an act making appropriation to pay sundry claims against the state,” which took effect on March 19, 1913. (Laws 1913, ch. 61.) The item reads:

“Item 106. To L. M. Hicks, for money expended for traveling expenses while in employ of State Grain Inspection Department from February, 1909 to June 11, 1912, $384.60, to be…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Loan Assn. v. TopekaSupreme Court of the United States · 1875
  2. Beach v. LeahySupreme Court of Kansas · 1873
  3. State ex rel. Johnson v. HitchcockSupreme Court of Kansas · 1862
  4. Prouty v. StoverSupreme Court of Kansas · 1873
  5. Anderson v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Kansas · 1908

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Leek v. TheisSupreme Court of Kansas · 1975
  2. STATE, EX REL. v. Urban Renewal Agency of Kansas CitySupreme Court of Kansas · 1956
  3. Sedlak v. DickSupreme Court of Kansas · 1995
  4. Pottawatomie County v. AlexanderSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
  5. Ullrich v. Board of Thomas County Comm'rsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1984

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API