Legal Opinion

Mitchell v. Comstock

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided May 22, 1940No. Gen. No. 41,027PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Burke

On June 30,1938, plaintiff filed a statement of claim in the municipal court of Chicago, and sought to recover from the defendant the sum of $14,049.99 on a promissory note dated Chicago, September 2,1924, for the principal sum of $8,333.33. The note was attached as exhibit 1. Therein the defendant promised to pay the principal amount on demand at 231 South LaSalle street, Chicago, with interest at 5 per cent per annum until paid. The note contained a warrant of attorney in the usual form, authorizing any attorney of any court of record to appear for him in such court, in term time or…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Farwell v. HustonIllinois Supreme Court · 1894
  2. Hibernian Banking Ass'n v. Commercial National BankIllinois Supreme Court · 1895
  3. Janeway v. BurtonIllinois Supreme Court · 1903
  4. Wooley v. YarnellIllinois Supreme Court · 1892
  5. Hansen v. SchlesingerIllinois Supreme Court · 1888

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Farley v. BlackwoodAppellate Court of Illinois · 1978
  2. Merchants & Planters National Bank of Sherman v. AppleyardSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
  3. Turner v. Alton Banking & Trust Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1950
  4. Green v. Unity Container Corp.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1955
  5. Greenberg v. NeimanAppellate Court of Illinois · 1943

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API