Corporex Companies, LLC. v. Proskauer Rose, LLP.
District Court, E.D. Kentucky
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BERTELSMAN, District Judge.
This is a legal malpractice action in which federal jurisdiction is based on diversity. The matter is before the court on defendant’s motion to dismiss, pursuant to Rule 12(b)(2) and 12(b)(6).
FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
This case arises out of an allegedly spurious tax shelter which was entered into by plaintiffs, Corporex Companies, LLC, Corporex Realty & Investments, LLC, and Corporex Investments, LLC, based on the legal opinion of defendant Proskauer Rose, LLP. The opinion stated the tax shelter was permissible and advantageous under Internal Revenue…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Walker v. Armco Steel Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Ragan v. Merchants Transfer & Warehouse Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Alagia, Day, Trautwein & Smith v. BroadbentKentucky Supreme Court · 1994
- Michels v. SklavosKentucky Supreme Court · 1994
- Queensway Financial Holdings Ltd. v. Cotton & Allen, P.S.C.Kentucky Supreme Court · 2007
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Bradford v. Bracken CountyDistrict Court, E.D. Kentucky · 2011
- Williams v. Kenton County, KYDistrict Court, E.D. Kentucky · 2023