Legal Opinion

Patrick S. Tate v. John Doe (Corr Officer), Bruce Siedschlag, Randall Hepp, Mark Schomisch, Eugene Devries, Carl Wiersma, and John Szweda

District Court, W.D. Wisconsin

Decided March 20, 2026No. 3:20-cv-00704Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN PATRICK S. TATE, Plaintiff, v. ORDER JOHN DOE (CORR OFFICER), BRUCE SIEDSCHLAG, RANDALL HEPP, 20-cv-704-jdp MARK SCHOMISCH, EUGENE DEVRIES, CARL WIERSMA, and JOHN SZWEDA, Defendants. Plaintiff Patrick S. Tate, a former inmate in the Wisconsin prison system, alleges that he was drugged and sexually assaulted by an unidentified “John Doe” correctional officer multiple times and that he was later physically assaulted by another inmate after he complained about the sexual assaults. Because Tate was unconscious during the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Schlagenhauf v. HolderSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  2. James E. Pinkston v. Anthony Madry and Janiene GrisselleCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2006
  3. Beach v. BeachCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1940
  4. McGrath v. Nassau Health Care Corp.District Court, E.D. New York · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API