Legal Opinion
James E. Pinkston v. Anthony Madry and Janiene Grisselle
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided March 14, 2006No. 03-2973PublishedCited by 240 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
COFFEY, Circuit. Judge.
On May 3, 2000, James Pinkston filed a complaint in federal court pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 alleging that two correctional officers at the Indiana Department of Corrections Maximum Control Complex in Westville, Indiana, violated his Eighth Amendment rights when they allowed another prisoner to assault him and thereafter refused to assist him in receiving adequate medical care. While discovery was underway, the district court assigned a magistrate judge to dispense with all non-dispositive matters and to file proposed findings of fact and conclusions of law. See 28…
2Cases cited39 opinions
- Farmer v. BrennanSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Anderson v. City of Bessemer CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- United States v. United States Gypsum Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Quintin Orpiano v. Gene M. Johnson, Warden W. P. Rodgers, Asst. Warden (Security) R. A. Clendenen Correctional CorporalCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1982
- United States v. RaddatzSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by240 opinions
- Jackson v. KotterCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2008
- Gary Orlowski v. Milwaukee County, WisconsinCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2017
- Follett Higher Education Group, Inc. v. Berman (In Re Berman)Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2011
- United States v. Larry Jones, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2022
- Sullivan v. Running Waters Irrigation, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2014
235 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.