Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Knighten

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 24, 1999PublishedCited by 38 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MUSMANNO, J.:

¶ 1 Appellant' Albert Knighten (“Knighten”) appeals from an Order dismissing his first Petition for relief filed pursuant to the PosNConviction Relief Act. See 42 Pa.C.S.A. §§ 9541-9546. We affirm.

¶ 2 The pertinent facts of this case are as follows. Knighten was convicted, after a jury trial, of third degree felony robbery, see 18 Pa.C.S.A. § STORaXlXv), 1 in connection with an incident that occurred on June 10, 1988. On that date, Knighten forcibly took earrings and a gold chain from the complainant while she was wearing them.

¶ 3 Knighten pled guilty to second degree felony…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. FinleySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  2. Commonwealth v. LantzySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
  3. Commonwealth v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
  4. Commonwealth v. QuinlanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
  5. Commonwealth v. HarmonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1999

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by38 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. MarkowitzSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
  2. Commonwealth v. BathSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
  3. Commonwealth v. BrownSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
  4. Commonwealth v. McDermittSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
  5. Commonwealth v. MaloneSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2003

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API