Legal Opinion
Bartman v. Shenker
New York Supreme Court
Decided September 1, 2004PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Sherry Klein Heitler, J.
Plaintiffs William Bartman and Art Resources Transfer, Inc. (ART) filed a complaint against defendants Gregg L. Shenker and Onbar, LLC alleging that defendants discriminated against Bartman and ART (Bartman’s employer) on the basis of Bart-man’s physical disability,1 creating a hostile environment, and retaliating against ART as a result of Bartman’s request that defendants accommodate his disability. Defendants now move to dismiss the complaint.
Defendant Onbar owned 210 11th Avenue in New York and defendant Shenker was employed by a managing agent…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- National Railroad Passenger Corporation v. MorganSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- National Organization for Women v. State Division of Human RightsNew York Court of Appeals · 1974
- Alco Gravure, Inc. v. Knapp FoundationNew York Court of Appeals · 1985
- Doria v. MasucciAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
- MATTER OF CAHILL v. RosaNew York Court of Appeals · 1996
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Bermudez v. City of New YorkDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2011
- Taylor v. City of New YorkDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2016
- Isbell v. City of N.Y.District Court, S.D. Illinois · 2018
- Bowrin v. Catholic Guardian SocietyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2006
- Pelton v. 77 Park Avenue CondominiumAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006