Fisher v. Automobile Supply Mfg. Co.
District Court, E.D. New York
At Law. Action by Charles Fisher against the Automobile Supply Manufacturing Company for infringement of letters patent No. 969,660, for a flexible metal tube or shaft, granted to.Schmidt and Grundmann September 6, 1910. On demurrer to amended complaint.
1Opinion of the Court
CHATFIELD, District Judge.
In the present action, which was brought at law to recover damages for alleged infringement of patent, a previous motion requiring the plaintiff to amend his complaint, in order to make it more definite and certain with respect to certain patents of the prior art, resulted in the amendment of the complaint by the insertion of an allegation that the infringement complained of was not through the use of a device under the Almond patent, No. 434,748, granted August 19, 1890, or the Scognamillo patent, No. 785,523, granted March 21, 1905.
As was shown in the opinion upon…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Hailes v. Albany Stove Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1887
- Towne Steering Wheel Co. v. LeeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1912
- Fischer v. Automobile Supply Mfg. Co.District Court, E.D. New York · 1912
- White v. E. P. Gleason Manuf'g Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1883
3Cited by1 opinion
- Carson v. American Smelting & Refining Co.District Court, W.D. Washington · 1923