Legal Opinion

Metcalf v. Williams

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided May 9, 1887PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHolmes, J.

This is an action of tort for the conversion of one hundred shares of stock. On November 22,1883, the plaintiff purchased one hundred shares through the defendant, who acted for her as a friend, without pay. On December 21, 1883, the defendant ordered a broker to buy one hundred shares more on sixty days’ credit, and deposited the first 'purchased shares as security. This deposit is the conversion relied on. The parties disagreed in their testimony as to the defendant’s authority to make this purchase.

On December 31, 1883, the plaintiff asked the defendant how she should know, if anything…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Foster v. RockwellMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1870
  2. Ladd v. HildebrantWisconsin Supreme Court · 1870
  3. Wellington v. JacksonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1876
  4. Oakes v. Manufacturers' Fire & Marine InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1883

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. DiLorenzo v. Atlantic National BankMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1932
  2. American Circular Loom Co. v. WilsonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1908
  3. Snow v. AlleyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1892
  4. Kearney Milling & Elevator Co. v. Union Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1896
  5. Boice-Perrine Co. v. KelleyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1923

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API