Legal Opinion

Oakes v. Manufacturers' Fire & Marine Insurance

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided June 27, 1883PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHolmes, J.

This is an action upon a policy of insurance conditioned to be void if the property should be “ sold or conveyed in whole or in part.” The plaintiff subsequently conveyed through a third person to his wife, and the answer sets up the conveyance as a breach of condition. It has already been decided that the condition was broken by the conveyance. Oakes v. Manufacturers’ Ins,. Co. 131 Mass. 164. But at a second trial the plaintiff offered to prove that he went to the office of the defendant company, and orally notified it of the conveyance and of a mortgage, which was made before the policy and…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Insurance Co. v. NortonSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  2. Titus v. . Glens Falls Insurance CompanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1880
  3. Oakes v. Manufacturers' Fire & Marine InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1881
  4. Wheeler v. Watertown Fire InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1881

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Equitable Life Assurance Society of United States v. EllisTexas Supreme Court · 1913
  2. Equitable Life Assur. Society of United States v. EllisTexas Supreme Court · 1913
  3. Tillis v. Liverpool & London & Globe InsuranceSupreme Court of Florida · 1903
  4. Metcalf v. WilliamsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1887
  5. Moffat Tunnel Improvement Dist. v. Denver & S. L. Ry. Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1930

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API