Legal Opinion
Universal Am-Can v. WCAB (MINTEER)
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
Decided March 16, 2005PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
870 A.2d 961 (2005)
UNIVERSAL AM-CAN, LTD. and AIG Claim Services, Inc., Petitioners
v.
WORKERS' COMPENSATION APPEAL BOARD (MINTEER), Respondent.
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania.
Argued February 3, 2005.
Decided March 16, 2005.
Michael S. Faber, Pittsburgh, for petitioner, Universal AM-Can, Ltd.
Eric G. Preputnick, Asst. Counsel, Harrisburg, for intervenor, Bureau of Workers' Compensation.
BEFORE: McGINLEY, Judge, and FRIEDMAN, Judge, and KELLEY, Senior Judge.
OPINION BY Judge McGINLEY.
Universal AM-CAN, LTD. (AM-CAN) and AIG Claim Services, Inc. (Insurer) (collectively, Petitioners) seek review of…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Commonwealth v. LittleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
- Vinglinsky v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
- Insurance Co. of North America v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
- Pennhurst Medical Group, P.C. v. Commonwealth, Department of Public WelfareCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
- Martin Trucking Co. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- County of Allegheny v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board (County of Allegheny)Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2018
- Department of Labor & Industry, Bureau of Workers' Compensation v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
- Lindtner v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2008