Legal Opinion

Lindtner v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided June 11, 2008No. 2080 C.D. 2007Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY

Senior Judge FLAHERTY.

John Lindtner (Claimant) petitions for review from an order of the Worker’ Compensation Appeal Board (Board) that affirmed the decision of a Workers’ Compensation Judge (WCJ) denying his two Petitions for Review of Utilization Review Determination (UR Petition). We affirm.

Claimant sustained an injury in the course and scope of his employment on August 20, 1991. Employer acknowledged lumbar disc disease with L4-5 radiculopa-thy in a Notice of Compensation Payable.

On September 16, 2004, Employer filed a Utilization Review Request (UR Request) seeking to determine…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Greenwich Collieries v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  2. Topps Chewing Gum v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
  3. County of Allegheny v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
  4. Sysco Food Services of Philadelphia v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2008
  5. Pries v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2006

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API