Jones v. Manning
California Court of Appeal
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the Court
WORKS, J., pro tem.
This action was commenced against the respondents, who were members of the board of supervisors of Los Angeles County, to recover against them as individuals for certain alleged omissions on their part to perform duties which the appellant contends were enjoined upon them, as supervisors, by law. The appellant sued as assignor of several other persons. Demurrers to the amended complaint on behalf of each of the respondents were sustained without leave to amend and judgment went accordingly. The appeal is from the judgment.
We learn from the amended complaint that appellant’s…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Archer v. FreemanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
- Lawrence v. MartinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1863
3Cited by1 opinion
- Cassetta v. Del FrateCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931