Legal Opinion

Jones v. Manning

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 15, 1917No. Civ. No. 1913PublishedCited by 1 opinion

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the Court

WORKS, J., pro tem.

This action was commenced against the respondents, who were members of the board of supervisors of Los Angeles County, to recover against them as individuals for certain alleged omissions on their part to perform duties which the appellant contends were enjoined upon them, as supervisors, by law. The appellant sued as assignor of several other persons. Demurrers to the amended complaint on behalf of each of the respondents were sustained without leave to amend and judgment went accordingly. The appeal is from the judgment.

We learn from the amended complaint that appellant’s…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Archer v. FreemanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
  2. Lawrence v. MartinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1863

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Cassetta v. Del FrateCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API