Lendholm v. Bailey
Colorado Court of Appeals
Error to the District Court of Arapahoe County.
1Opinion of the CourtBissell, P. J.
The copartnership transactions between Lendholm and Bailey gave rise to this suit, and the circumstances attending the cessation of their business raises the only question which the record permits us to determine. There are other matters, but as we look at them, they are not of sufficient consequence to warrant us to disturb the judgment.
With reference to this one matter we think the court erred, providing it shall ultimately find the facts as they now appear. As we look at the record we in no manner interfere with the findings of the court. Those findings are very inaptly and inartificially…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Riddle v. WhitehillSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
- Currier v. StudleyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1893
- Bonney v. StoughtonIllinois Supreme Court · 1887
- Quayle v. GuildIllinois Supreme Court · 1878
- Ligare v. PeacockIllinois Supreme Court · 1884
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Ruth v. FlynnColorado Court of Appeals · 1914
- Pepper v. HymanSupreme Court of Colorado · 1947
- Ruth v. FlynnColorado Court of Appeals · 1914
- Ruth v. FlynnColorado Court of Appeals · 1914