Legal Opinion

Bonney v. Stoughton

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided November 11, 1887PublishedCited by 23 opinions

Appeal from the Appellate Court for the First District;— heard in that court on appeal from the Circuit Court of Cook county; the Hon. Thomas A. Moran, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Shope

This bill, filed by appellant, Bonney, assignee of Edward G-. Bowzer, seeks an accounting in respect to the partnership affairs of the late firm of C. H. Crowell & Co., of which Charles H. Crowell and said Edward Gr. Bowzer were the co-partners.

It is alleged in the bill, that the co-partnership theretofore ■existing between Crowell and Bowzer “was terminated and ended by the mutual acts, consent and acquiescence of both parties,” on the 21st day of May, 1879. It is also alleged, that there was an attempt at accounting between the co-partners, and that Bowzer, in good faith, believed there was…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Stearns v. PageSupreme Court of the United States · 1849
  2. Weed v. . WeedNew York Court of Appeals · 1883
  3. Quayle v. GuildIllinois Supreme Court · 1878
  4. Hancock v. HarperIllinois Supreme Court · 1877
  5. Conner v. GoodmanIllinois Supreme Court · 1882

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Steinmeyer v. SchroeppelIllinois Supreme Court · 1907
  2. Hibernian Banking Ass'n v. Commercial National BankIllinois Supreme Court · 1895
  3. Order of United Commercial Travelers v. McAdamCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1903
  4. Reedy v. MillizenIllinois Supreme Court · 1895
  5. Joseph Kedzierski v. Michael KedzierskiCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1990

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API