Legal Opinion

Ruth v. Flynn

Colorado Court of Appeals

Decided April 5, 1914No. Court of Appeals No. 3935Published

Error to- Denver District Court. Hon. Carlton M. Bliss,. Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtCunningham, P. J.

The facts involved in this case, and which are necessary to its proper determination, present some interesting questions. We have been able to find but one or two cases that seem to be parallel in all respects. To these we will refer later. A rather full statement of the facts will materially shorten the opinion. Joseph P. Ruth and John T. Flynn,, some time prior to February 24, 1909, formed a partnership, under the firm name and style of The- Ruth-Flynn Construction Company. On September 30, 1908, each member of this-firm took out an insurance policy on his life in the sum of $5,000. These…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Warnock v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
  2. Cheeves v. Anders, AdministratorTexas Supreme Court · 1894
  3. Gilmore v. . HamNew York Court of Appeals · 1894
  4. Connecticut Mutual Life Insurance v. LuchsSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
  5. Lord v. DallMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1815

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API