Legal Opinion

State v. Hentschel

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided December 21, 1953No. 4222PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKenison, C. J.

This prosecution was instituted under the provisions of R. L., c. 441, s. 14, as amended by Laws 1949, c. 256, s. 1, “An Act Relating to Obscene Literature, Pictures and Articles” which reads as follows: “14. Publications, Possession, etc. No person shall print, sell, lend, give or show to any other person, nor have in his possession or control with intent to sell, lend, give to, show to, any other person, any obscene or lewd or lascivious thing, object, book, pamphlet, magazine, newspaper, print or picture and no person shall circulate, display or post any advertisement of any such thing,…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Sealfon v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
  2. United States v. OppenheimerSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
  3. People v. CreeganCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
  4. Commonwealth v. TilleyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1951
  5. Commonwealth v. CoontzSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1926

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. ProulxSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1970
  2. People v. SeltzerAppellate Division of the Superior Court of California · 1972
  3. State v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1981
  4. Waters v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2004
  5. Waters v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API