Earnest v. Metropolitan Life Insurance
District Court, M.D. Florida
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
LAZZARA, District Judge.
This cause comes before the Court on Defendants Metropolitan Life Insurance Company and Home Depot U.S.A.’s Motion for Summary Judgment (dkt.32) and supporting memorandum and exhibits (dkt. 33 & 34) and Plaintiff James Earnest Jr.’s Memorandum in Opposition thereto (dkt.36).
FACTUAL BACKGROUND
Plaintiff, James Earnest, Jr. (“Earnest”), brings this action under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, as amended, 29 U.S.C. §§ 1001 et seq. (“ERISA”). Plaintiff, a 61-year old male, was employed by Defendant Home Depot U.S.A., Inc. (“the Company”) as a…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- United States v. Diebold, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. BruchSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Black & Decker Disability Plan v. NordSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
- Fred Brown v. Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Alabama, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1990
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Briggs v. Marriott International, Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 2005
- Wise v. Hartford Life and Accident Ins. Co.District Court, N.D. Georgia · 2005
- Berkoben v. Aetna Life InsuranceDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2014
- Baker v. Hartford Life and Accident Ins. Co.District Court, M.D. Florida · 2005
- Buonincontri v. Liberty Life Assur. Co. of BostonDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 2006