Legal Opinion
State v. Skiles
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
Decided January 29, 1997No. 433-94PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION ON STATE’S PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW
McCORMICK, Presiding Judge.
Appellee was arrested and charged with driving while intoxicated (DWI). Appellee filed a motion to suppress evidence obtained as the result of an unreasonable search and seizure in violation of the Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution and Article I, Section 9 of the Texas Constitution. The trial court granted appellee’s motion, finding that the actions of the police officers constituted “a roadblock.” The State appealed and the Second Court of Appeals affirmed, State v. Skiles, 870 S.W.2d 341…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- United States v. MendenhallSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Delaware v. ProuseSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- California v. Hodari D.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Romero v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1990
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Tucker v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1999
- Jordy v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1998
- State v. Ayala, Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)1998
- Wheeling v. Director of North Dakota Department of TransportationNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1997
- Jones v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2009
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.