Legal Opinion

United States v. Bertelsen & Petersen Engineering Co.

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided February 27, 1939No. Nos. 416 and 437PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice McReynolds

In each of these causes counsel for thé United States maintain the District Court was without jurisdiction to determiné the issues. The Circuit Courts of Appeal ruled otherwise and approved judgments for respondents. The collectors who received the excéss taxes in question were either déád or out of office when the proceedings to recover were commenced. The question of jurisdiction only is open for oiir consideration.

Section 145 Judicial Code 1 empowers the Cdurt of Claims to hear and determine claims against the Uhitéd States arising out of contract, express or implied. Prior to 1921 § 24…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Lowe Bros. Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Goodrich v. CoffinSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1891

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Tank Truck Rentals, Inc. v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  2. United States v. A. S. Kreider Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
  3. A. G. Reeves Steel Const. Co. v. WeissCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1941
  4. Smith v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1960
  5. Massachusetts Protective Ass'n v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1940

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API