Legal Opinion

Zimmermann v. Brennan

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided June 14, 1977No. 75-326PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHeffernan, J.

The plaintiff, H. Russell Zimmer-mann, is a commercial artist, who had been employed by the Advertising Art Studios until September of 1970. He subsequently commenced work with Barkin-Herman and Associates. As an employee of the Advertising Art Studios, he was a participant in the Advertising Art’s profit sharing plan, and upon his termination of employment with Advertising Art, he claimed his undisputed vested share of the profit sharing trust in the amount of $8,776.67. The defendants in this action, Brennan, Redell, and Jahnke, trustees of the profit sharing trust, refused payment on the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Voigt v. South Side Laundry & Dry Cleaners, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1964
  2. Van Pelt v. Berefco, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1965
  3. Storz Broadcasting Co. v. CourtneyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1965
  4. Holsen v. Marshall & Ilsley BankWisconsin Supreme Court · 1971
  5. Behnke v. Hertz Corp.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1975

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing Company v. Ronald Pribyl, James Harvey, Thomas Skrtic, and Accu-Tech Plastics, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2001
  2. Streiff v. American Family Mutual InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Christopher J. Heder v. City of Two Rivers, WisconsinCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2002
  4. Heyde Companies v. Dove Healthcare, LLCWisconsin Supreme Court · 2002
  5. Fields Foundation, Ltd. v. ChristensenCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1981

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API