Legal Opinion

Behnke v. Hertz Corp.

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided December 10, 1975No. 606 (1974)PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHeffernan, J.

The case arises from a restrictive employment contract, the breach of which, it is alleged, was induced by the Hertz Corporation. From a judgment awarding $982.26 compensatory damages and $10,000 punitive damages to the plaintiff, Marvin A. Behnke, d/b/a National Car Rental System, the Hertz Corporation and Keith A. Mott, a Hertz employee, have appealed.

We conclude that the restrictive employment contract was invalid as a matter of law; and, accordingly, the case ought not to have been submitted to the jury, and the complaint of the plaintiff must be dismissed.

The facts of record show that…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Wisconsin Ice & Coal Co. v. LuethWisconsin Supreme Court · 1933

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. NBZ, INC. v. PilarskiCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1994
  2. Nalco Chemical Company v. Hydro Technologies, Incorporated, Daniel H. Girmscheid and Thomas S. BrogeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1993
  3. Fields Foundation, Ltd. v. ChristensenCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1981
  4. Wausau Medical Center v. AsplundCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1994
  5. Runzheimer International, Ltd. v. David FriedlenWisconsin Supreme Court · 2015

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API