Vashisht-Rota v. Harrisburg University
District Court, S.D. California
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 APARNA VASHIST-ROTA, Case No.: 20-cv-967-AGS-KSC 12 Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR 13 v. RECONSIDERATION [Doc. No. 118] 14 HARRISBURG UNIVERSITY, 15 Defendant. 16 17 On August 18, 2021, plaintiff moved for reconsideration of the Court’s prior 18 Discovery Order dated August 20, 2024. See Doc. No. 119. Briefing has concluded— 19 including an extra, unauthorized Reply filed by plaintiff, which the Court exercises its 20 discretion to consider because plaintiff, as a pro se litigant, may not have been aware…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- 389 Orange Street Partners v. ArnoldCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
- United States v. RicheyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- Frasure v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 2003
- Phillips v. C.R. Bard, Inc.District Court, D. Nevada · 2013
- Sherman v. Yahoo! Inc.District Court, S.D. California · 2014
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.