Legal Opinion
Lennon v. McClory
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided March 27, 1998No. Civ. A. 96-2652 (PLF)PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
PAUL L. FRIEDMAN, District Judge.
This matter is before the Court on defendants’ renewal of their motion to quash service of process and plaintiffs response. Both plaintiff, a resident of the Republic of Ireland, and defendant are proceeding pro se in this matter. 1
Plaintiff claims that defendants Kevin McClory and S.P.E.C.T.R.E. Corporation, of which McClory is president, intended to defraud the plaintiff with respect to a copyright. The basis for this claim is a contract between plaintiff and defendants that allegedly entitles plaintiff to one-third of the proceeds for use…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Rowland v. California Men's Colony, Unit II Men's Advisory CouncilSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Harris O. Schoenberg v. Shapolsky Publishers, Incorporated, Ian Shapolsky and Steimatzky Publishing of North America, Inc., Samuel A. Abady, Esq.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1992
- Muse v. MellinDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1962
- Keith v. ScruggsDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1981
- Gloria I. Nelson v. Elizabeth Thompson SwiftCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1959
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Kopff v. World Research Group, LLCDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2003
- Partridge v. Am. Hosp. Mgmt. Co.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2017
- Perez v. BerhanuDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2008
- Motir Services, Inc. v. EkwunoDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2016
- United States Securities & Exchange Commission v. China Infrastructure Investment Corp.District Court, District of Columbia · 2016
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.