Legal Opinion

Brown v. Quantcast Corp.

District Court, N.D. California

Decided December 11, 2019No. 3:19-cv-05773Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 TAG BROWN, Case No. 19-cv-05773-EMC 8 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S 9 v. MOTION TO COMPEL ARBITRATION; AND STAYING CASE 10 QUANTCAST CORP., Docket No. 22 11 Defendant. 12 13 14 Plaintiff Tag Brown has filed a putative class and collective action against Defendant 15 Quantcast Corp., his former employer. According to Mr. Brown, “Quantcast is a website analytics 16 company.” Compl. ¶ 14. He worked for Quantcast as a sales representative for which he was paid 17 a salary plus commissions. He was deemed exempt from…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Armendariz v. Found. Health Psychcare Servs., Inc.California Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Baltazar v. Forever 21, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2016
  3. Sakkab v. Luxottica Retail North America, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
  4. Narayan v. EGL, INC.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
  5. Mercuro v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API