Legal Opinion
Carter v. ALK Holdings, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided May 24, 2010No. 2008-1168PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion for the court filed by Circuit Judge DYK. Opinion concurring-in-part, dissenting-in-part filed by Circuit Judge NEWMAN.
DYK, Circuit Judge.
Myers & Kaplan Intellectual Property Law, LLC (“Myers & Kaplan”) appeals from an order of the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia imposing sanctions of $30,356.89 pursuant to Rule 11 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.1 The district court imposed the sanctions after it found that three claims advanced by Myers & Kaplan on behalf of the plaintiff Randall B. Carter (“Carter”), Counts I, VIII, and XI, were baseless…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Cooter & Gell v. Hartmarx Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Christianson v. Colt Industries Operating Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Sperry v. Florida Ex Rel. Florida BarSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Midwest Industries, Inc. v. Karavan Trailers, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1999
- Hunter Douglas, Inc. v. Harmonic Design, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Hall v. Bed Bath & Beyond, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2013
- Woods v. Deangelo Marine Exhaust, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2012
- Highmark, Inc. v. Allcare Health Management Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2012
- Caldera Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. Regents of the UniversityCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
- Boyce v. PruittPatrick County Circuit Court · 2010
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.