Legal Opinion
Morel v. Harry Thoens & Co.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided October 11, 1945PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
HULBERT, District Judge.
The motion is to bring in additional parties plaintiff.
The plaintiffs, maintenance employees in defendants’ building, 261 Fifth Avenue, New York, N. Y., brought this action, commenced Oct. 28th, 1944, for the recovery of overtime wages, liquidated damages, a reasonable counsel fee, and the costs and *189disbursements of this action, under Section 16(b) of the Fair Labor Standards Act, 29 U.S.C.A. § 216(b).
Issue was joined Dec. 4, 1944, and the case has since been on the calendar and the trial was adjourned pending the outcome of Callus v. 10 E. 40th Street Corp., in the U.…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Brooklyn Savings Bank v. O'NeilSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- 10 East 40th Street Building, Inc. v. CallusSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Gangi v. D. A. Schulte, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1945
- Steingut v. National City Bank of New YorkDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1941
- Goldfarb v. WrightCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1943
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Jarrard v. Southeastern Shipbuilding CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1947