Legal Opinion

95 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 7612, 95 Daily Journal D.A.R. 13,078 Mhc, Inc., an Oregon Corporation Plm International, Inc., a Delaware Corporation Celtran, Inc., a Delaware Corporation v. Oregon Department of Revenue Richard A. Munn, Director of the Dept. Of Revenue of the State of Oregon, Acf Industries, Inc. General American Transportation Corporation General Electric Railcar Services Corporation Pullman Leasing Company Railbox Company Railgon Company Trailer Train Company Union Tank Car Company v. Oregon Department of Revenue Richard A. Munn, Director of the Dept. Of Revenue of the State of Oregon, Burlington Northern Railroad Company Portland Terminal Railroad Company v. Oregon Dept. Of Revenue Richard A. Munn, Director of the Dept. Of Revenue of the State of Oregon

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided September 29, 1995No. 94-35939PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

66 F.3d 1082

95 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 7612, 95 Daily Journal

D.A.R. 13,078

MHC, INC., an Oregon corporation; PLM International, Inc.,

a Delaware corporation; Celtran, Inc., a Delaware

corporation, Plaintiffs-Appellants,

v.

OREGON DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE; Richard A. Munn, Director of

the Dept. of Revenue of the State of Oregon,

Defendants-Appellees.

ACF INDUSTRIES, INC.; General American Transportation

Corporation; General Electric Railcar Services Corporation;

Pullman Leasing Company; Railbox Company; Railgon

Company; Trailer Train Company; Union Tank Car Company,

Plaintiffs-Appellants,

v.

OREGON DEPARTMENT OF…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Department of Revenue of Ore. v. ACF Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1994
  2. Cassim v. BowenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
  3. The Squaxin Island Tribe v. The State of WashingtonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
  4. Acf Industries Incorporated General American Transportation Corporation Union Tank Car Company v. California State Board of EqualizationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
  5. CSX Transportation, Inc. v. ForstDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 1991

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. 98 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 2023, 98 Daily Journal D.A.R. 2839 Oregon Short Line Railroad Company, Union Pacific Railroad Company Oregon-Washington Railroad & Navigation Co. v. Department of Revenue Oregon State of Oregon, Union Pacific Railroad Company Oregon Short Line Railroad Company Oregon-Washington Railroad & Navigation Co. v. Department of Revenue Oregon State of Oregon, Union Pacific Railroad Company Oregon-Washington Railroad & Navigation Co., Oregon Short Line Railroad Co. v. Department of Revenue Oregon State of Oregon, Union Pacific Railroad Company and Its Lessors Oregon-Washington Railroad & Navigation Company, and Oregon Short Line Railroad Company v. Department of Revenue Oregon State of Oregon, Oregon Short Line Railroad Company Union Pacific Railroad Company Oregon-Washington Railroad & Navigation Co. v. Department of Revenue Oregon, Oregon Short Line Railroad Company Union Pacific Railroad Company Oregon-Washington Railroad & Navigation Co. v. Department of Revenue Oregon, Oregon Short Line Railroad Company Union Pacific Railroad Company Oregon-Washington Railroad & Navigation Co. v. Department of Revenue Oregon State of Oregon, Union Pacific Railroad Company Oregon Short Line Railroad Company Oregon-Washington Railroad & Navigation Co. v. Department of Revenue Oregon State of Oregon, Oregon Short Line Railroad Company Union Pacific Railroad Company Oregon-Washington Railroad & Navigation Co. v. Department of Revenue Oregon State of Oregon, Oregon Short Line Railroad Company Union Pacific Railroad Company Oregon-Washington Railroad & Navigation Co. v. Department of Revenue Oregon State of OregonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
  2. Kimberly S. Saavedra the Estate of Masakazu Yamaguchi Makiko Yamaguchi Chisato Yamaguchi, Plaintiffs-Appellees-Cross-Appellants v. Korean Air Lines Company, Ltd. Defendant-Appellant-Cross-Appellee. Kimberly S. Saavedra, as Special Administratrix of the Estate of Makoto Okai, Deceased, and as Personal Representative of Toru Okai and Hitoko Okai, Plaintiff-Appellant-Cross-Appellee v. Korean Air Lines Company, Ltd., Defendant-Appellee-Cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
  3. Saavedra v. Korean Air Lines Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API