Legal Opinion

Ammerman Ex Rel. Ammerman v. Farmers Insurance Exchange

Utah Supreme Court

Decided February 10, 1969No. 11068PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CALLISTER, Justice.

One Eddie Soliz was rendered judgment again Edward Wilson Ammerman for personal injuries sustained in an automobile accident in the sum of $15,282. This judgment was affirmed upon appeal to this court. 1 Subsequently, Soliz and Ammer-man, as joint plaintiffs, commenced an action against Farmers Insurance Exchange, Ammerman’s automobile insurance carrier, alleging that the latter had negligently and in bad faith failed to accept an offer of settlement in an amount less than the policy limit which was $10,000. They asked to recover for the amount of the judgment in excess of…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. G. A. Stowers Furniture Co. v. American Indemnity Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1929
  2. Gray v. Nationwide Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1966
  3. State Automobile Mut. Ins. Co. of Columbus v. YorkCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1939
  4. Ammerman Ex Rel. Ammerman v. Farmers Insurance ExchangeUtah Supreme Court · 1967
  5. Dumas v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1942

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Glenn v. FlemingSupreme Court of Kansas · 1990
  2. Hernandez v. Great American Insurance Co. of New YorkTexas Supreme Court · 1971
  3. Campbell v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Utah · 1992
  4. Carter v. Pioneer Mutual Casualty Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1981
  5. Frankenmuth Mutual Insurance v. KeeleyMichigan Supreme Court · 1989

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API