Dumas v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
1Opinion of the CourtPage, J.
The questions transferred will be answered in reversed order.(1) The defendant claims that the right of action, if one exists, is equitable. It is argued that the defendant’s obligation, if it has any, is one of indemnity and that the insured is seeking exoneration. But the defendant did not contract to indemnify the plaintiff with respect to his liability beyond the stipulated sum of $5,000, and it has performed that contract of indemnity in full by the payment of that sum, with interest and costs, and has presumably paid the expenses of the defence of the suit brought by Ann Moran. Its…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Douglas v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1924
- Sanders v. Frankfort Marine, Accident & Plate Glass InsuranceSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1904
- White v. SchnoebelenSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1941
- Duncan v. Lumbermen's Mutual Casualty Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1941
- Cavanaugh v. General Accident Fire & Life Assurance Corp.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1919
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by33 opinions
- Brown v. Guarantee InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957
- Harvey Thomas Smoot, Jr. v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1962
- Lawton v. Great Southwest Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1978
- Melville Harris, as Trustee in Bankruptcy of Leonard Massello and William Massello v. Standard Accident and Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1961
- Stockdale v. JamisonMichigan Supreme Court · 1982
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.